06.10.2010
WHO IS THE CORKSCREW KILLER?
By Jeffrey Gallant (GEERG)

 

NOTE: Although GEERG researchers Jeffrey Gallant and Chris Harvey-Clark appear in The Seal Ripper (Nature Shock Season 3 Episode 9), and Predator CSI: Corkscrew Killer (National Geographic Channel), we do not believe the Greenland shark is the "Corkscrew Killer."

Sable Island and now the North Sea are ripe with controversy surrounding the Greenland shark. It has long been suggested that Sable Island is a hunting ground for sharks based on the regular appearance of mutilated seal carcasses. Many of the victims present a corkscrew-like cut that twists around the length of the seal's body. This frightful wound is believed by many to be the result of a Greenland shark attack. Similar reports began to emanate out of England and Scotland in the summer of 2010.

There is no doubt that the Greenland shark does occasionally predate live seals. However, the victim would probably be an inexperienced pup or be asleep, distracted, injured, in an ice hole, or the visibility would have to be so poor as to offer the seal no warning of the incoming shark's presence. The Greenland shark is much more likely to feed on an already dead seal, which requires no energy output and that offers no risk of injury, for even small seals have sizeable teeth with which to defend themselves.


The Greenland shark is nonetheless capable of swift movement. We've observed this underwater on numerous occasions while attaching tags to sharks with a spear-like device. We've also seen sharks bolt when touched or approached too closely by divers. They can surely swoop on prey although it would probably amount to no more than a few quick bursts.

The Greenland shark is also capable of stealth. My colleague and I experienced this firsthand when a 4-metre shark surprised us in low visibility right under our boat and at a depth of only 5 metres. All I saw was a shadow that I mistook for Chris who was actually head butting with our unexpected guest. It isn’t hard to imagine how an unsuspecting seal could be taken in such conditions. After surfacing from a night dive four years later, we shook our heads when VideoRay’s Brian Luzzi asked, “How big was that shark?” The sonar-equipped ROV pilot had seen the shark swimming behind us but we had been completely oblivious to its presence.

These incidents shed light on how a Greenland shark could potentially attempt to take an idle or slow-moving seal. However, easier prey is usually available, and it’s even better if the victim is already dead or requires little effort to consume. A lingering chase and the ensuing battle waste much energy, and this is something the shark needs to avoid. This is one of the reasons why we do not believe that the Greenland shark is associated with the so-called "corkscrew" kills at Sable Island and in the UK.

The corkscrew wound is a long clean cut that spirals around the victim’s body thus exposing the seal’s muscles and organs. Assuming that the Greenland shark – intent on conserving energy – cannot afford to kill for pleasure, why would it abandon its prey without feeding?  Photo analysis reveals that many seal carcasses found with the corkscrew wound appear otherwise intact: no parts are missing. It makes no sense whatsoever for a Greenland shark to needlessly expend the fuel it needs to survive if it isn't going to feed. It will not reduce its energy stores and risk injury unless it plans on consuming most, if not its entire victim. It has to do so in order to make up for the energy spent during the kill and to be more 'energized' than it was before it engaged its opponent. Much of the photographic evidence consists of small seal carcasses that could have been completely eaten by a mature Greenland shark. Also, we know from our telemetry research that the Greenland shark travels in large numbers. If a seal actually were too big, other sharks in the vicinity would quickly eat what was left of the remains. Only small bits and pieces would be left for the crabs or to eventually float to shore.

The St. Lawrence Estuary is home to a large population of the Greenland shark. It is also one of the most important seal breeding areas in the world. And yet we have never witnessed or received reports of corkscrew wounds. Seal carcasses occasionally wash up on the northern shore of Prince Edward Island in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, but the lesions are different. Many of the seals are missing their head or flippers and there's a good chance they are mostly juveniles that died of natural causes in their first year. This leads to the obvious question: Why would the Greenland shark's feeding behaviour be so markedly different from one location to another? In other words, why would the corkscrew wound only appear at Sable Island and in the UK?

The environmental and behavioural evidence put forward also does not concur with our own findings that are based in part on telemetry data and on actual observations of the Greenland shark. The waters around Sable Island, a 44-km-long sand bar about 150 km east of mainland Nova Scotia, are shallow and the bathymetry is not that which is usually associated with this species. Other environmental factors, which will be detailed in a new science article by GEERG in 2011, might also make Sable Island seasonally inhospitable to the Greenland shark.

Research conducted by GEERG in the St. Lawrence would indicate that the preferred temperature range for the Greenland shark is from -1˚C to 6˚C. The warmer conditions found off Norfolk (UK) are not unheard of for the Greenland shark. However, they are at the extreme range for this species that repeatedly retreats to much deeper and colder conditions on a daily basis. With an average depth of 94 m, the North Sea itself is not ideal habitat for the Greenland shark.


As far as we know, the Greenland shark has never been observed alive at either location although the odd dead shark could certainly wash up on shore at Sable at any time of the year. This doesn’t mean it isn’t out there. The Greenland shark could be present in large numbers in winter when the water is colder and the days are shorter, to feed on seal pups that drift out to sea, dead or alive. Seal carcasses that wash up on Sable Island without the distinctive corkscrew wound may have indeed been scavenged or killed by the Greenland shark patrolling offshore. However, whether the shark is present or not may ultimately prove to be irrelevant, for the secret lies in the bite.

Missing heads and flippers are typical of a Greenland shark feeding, but the only confirmed bite wound pattern for the Greenland shark is circular. The shark bites into its victim and then twists itself repeatedly until a “plug” of flesh is torn out. It may even be possible for a large seal – or even a cetacean – to survive such an attack. The corkscrew wound simply does not fit with the known feeding pattern of the Greenland shark: a pattern that has been observed and filmed.


The actual cause of the corkscrew wound is probably mechanical. If this is the case, the culprits are almost certainly dynamic positioning thrusters used by vessels associated with offshore drilling or construction. Such operations are present off all sites reporting corkscrew wounds (see below). Seals are curious creatures often seen diving near shipwrecks and other man-made objects. The powerful suction effect produced by a thruster would easily overpower a seal that got too close. Unlike regular ship propellers that run continuously while a ship is at sea, thrusters operate on a need-only basis and thus turn on and off sporadically.

A curious seal inspecting the intake side of this odd tunnel-like object would have no chance if the power were suddenly turned on. Being sucked into the blades would either slice the hapless seal to death or produce the horrific wounds witnessed at Sable Island and in the UK. Some of the butchered seals may even survive and swim back to the beach to die.

The Greenland shark does leave a trademark wound on its victims but this most certainly isn't it. We therefore believe that corkscrew fatalities at Sable Island and in the UK are in fact unrelated to the Greenland shark.

Human activity is yet again the likely cause for these needless deaths. Who knows how many lifeless bodies didn’t actually make it to shore? Life is dangerous enough for seals without having to deal with giant underwater food processors. If I were a seal, I'd choose the shark. I would at least have a fighting chance to survive, and if I were killed, my death would serve to sustain a fellow creature of the sea.

Our findings will be published in 2013.

Note: Some of the more mangled dead seals that wash up at Sable Island may have been killed by the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias, which appears to be making a comeback in the North Atlantic.

OFFSHORE DRILLING AND CONSTRUCTION OFF SABLE ISLAND AND IN THE UK:

Sable Offshore Energy Project
Wind farm clue to horrific 'corkscrew' seal deaths
The New North Sea Oil Rush



NEW FINDINGS SINCE THIS ARTICLE WAS PUBLISHED
27.10.2010 - Study into seal deaths points to ships' propellers. Mysterious seal deaths blamed on boats rather than sharks.